Originally posted by zeeblebotThe Telegraph is political, the Guardian also, they all have paymasters hence they have a 'stance'..if a paper employs such a 'warmist overviewer' then one must view cautiously and draw conclusion based upon the initial comment. I rather believe that if a paper employs such, but with the intention of putting their view forward, come what may, then they'll go to great efforts to stress their neutral stance. Is this the case ?? The BBC is wholly different, they have all manner of official lines to uphold, one being there are independant ombudsman to satisfy with every transmission made..
if i recall the Telegraph actually has warmists on staff counterbalancing the anti-warmists, can the Guardian or the Beeb say the same?